A Reflection on the Removal of Lara Taylor-Pearce and Tamba Momoh
By Basita Michael
Let it go on record that the allegations of professional misconduct levelled against Lara Taylor-Pearce and one of her deputies, Tamba Momoh, culminating in their removal, were not rooted in a genuine commitment to upholding ethics or professional conduct.
On the contrary, the decision underscores a troubling pattern in which accountability is selectively enforced.
We have witnessed clear instances of misconduct by high-ranking officials, such as the Anti-Corruption Commissioner’s role in the SLBA elections in Kenema, captured on camera, and Paran Umar Tarawally’s abuse of office.
Furthermore, the former Chief Justice, Babatunde Edwards, despite allegations of abuse of authority, was not held accountable but rather rewarded with an ambassadorial appointment to the Republic of Ireland.
This glaring inconsistency, where some are shielded from scrutiny while others are subjected to severe consequences, has reinforced the perception that the law does not apply equitably in Sierra Leone.
The removal of Taylor-Pearce and Momoh sends a troubling message – there is little room in governance for individuals who are steadfast in their commitment to upholding the highest ethical and professional standards.
As a society, we must reflect on what this means for our democratic values and the integrity of our institutions.
Leave a Reply