No elections took place in Sierra Leone in 2023 because there are no results : U.S. Ambassador hit the right chord

The Fadika Factor supports the statement of the USA AMBASADOR: No elections took place in Sierra Leone because there were no RESULTS 😀😭🤣🧐🤩David Reimer, the US Ambassador to Sierra Leone, voiced apprehensions regarding the 2023 election outcomes. During his recent interview on AYV radio, the ambassador emphasized irregularities in the results declared by the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone (ECSL), pointing out discrepancies between the ECSL’s results and parallel vote tabulations, along with inconsistencies noted by both domestic and international observers. In summary, neither the SLPP nor the APC presented credible results. The elections did not occur.
He also highlighted the absence of civility in the electoral process, emphasizing logistical issues and a deficiency of openness.
Furthermore, he stated that a reexamination of the June 2023 elections may be impractical due to the lapse of the 7-day period for contesting the presidential election outcomes.
He additionally asserted that Aside from legal challenges, the opposition in Sierra Leone undertook other measures subsequent to the 2023 election results. They orchestrated rallies and demonstrations to convey their discontent with the electoral process and outcomes.
The protests sought to underscore topics including unemployment, economic adversity, and injustices. The opposition participated in intra-party conflicts and confrontations with security personnel in multiple regions.
The formation of the Tripartite Committee and the involvement of the international community were crucial measures implemented to address the issues about the 2023 election outcomes in Sierra Leone. The Tripartite Committee was established to evaluate the nation’s electoral processes in the aftermath of the contentious June 2023 presidential elections and to administer justice when warranted.
The participation of the international community, encompassing entities such as the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the European Union, and the Embassy of Ireland, was essential in facilitating the peaceful execution of the elections and guaranteeing that the electoral process was inclusive and transparent.
The efficacy of these measures is contingent upon their execution and the commitment of all parties to engage in constructive communication and collaboration. The opposition’s choice to pursue foreign intervention and form the Tripartite Committee was a tactical maneuver to articulate their grievances and advocate for election reforms.
The execution of the 84 resolutions and electoral justice by ECOMISIL remains a subject of discourse. The term “Actionable and Implementable” has been commonly employed concerning the Tripartite Committee’s inquiry, which encompasses these resolutions.
The actual execution will hinge on several elements, including the collaboration of all stakeholders and the efficacy of ECOMISIL’s deployment.
Opposition sympathizers harbor optimism that ECOMISIL will facilitate electoral justice in Sierra Leone after the contentious presidential elections.
The postponement of ECOMISIL’s deployment to Sierra Leone is chiefly attributable to the inadequacy of the designated deployment locations. The four strategically selected sites—Lungi, Murray Town/Aberdeen Axis, Kerry Town, and Hastings Airfields—are not yet prepared to host the military.
The ongoing renovations and preparations at these sites have resulted in the delay.
These localities are selected for their strategic significance and the necessity to maintain security and stability in certain regions.
The first deployment will focus on these locations, with potential expansion to additional regions of Sierra Leone contingent upon the evolving circumstances and the mission’s mandate. The objective is to bolster the armed forces, safeguard essential state institutions, and maintain a secure environment. The time is passing rapidly.