SOMEBODY WRITING ANONYMOUSLY , WITHOUT A REAL NAME, SOUGHT TO TEACH SLPP BLOODHOUNDS THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUSPECT AND CULPRIT.
This attempt to teach rabid SLPP supporters that there is a difference between suspect and culprit came in the wake of widespread SLPP calls on social media for the head of former President Ernest Koroma as he faces CID investigations for the November 26, 2023 shootings in Freetown, which has been described as a coup attempt by the SLPP Government.
An SLPP journalist Sorie Fofanah , has even written an article, begging President Maada Bio to bring back the death penalty to enable the government to kill all those accused of involvement in the so-called coup attempt.
SLPP supporters are thirsty for the blood of former President Ernest Koroma. BUT BELOW, AN ANONYMOUS WRITE ON SOCIAL MEDIA DECIDED TO DELIVER THIS LESSON TO SLPP SUPPORTERS ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SUSPECT AND CULPRIT .
________________________________
A suspect and a culprit are two terms often used in criminal investigations, but they have distinct meanings and roles in the legal context.
A suspect is a person who is believed to have some involvement or connection to a crime. They are someone who is suspected of committing the crime based on evidence or information gathered during the investigation. However, being a suspect does not mean that the person is guilty of the crime. It simply means that there is reasonable suspicion that they may have been involved.
On the other hand, a culprit is a person who has been proven or found guilty of committing a crime. A culprit is the individual who is responsible for the offense and has been legally determined to have committed the act. Culprits are typically identified through a thorough investigation, gathering of evidence, and a fair trial process.
To summarize, a suspect is someone who is suspected of being involved in a crime, while a culprit is someone who has been proven or found guilty of committing the crime. It is important to remember that an individual remains a suspect until they are proven guilty in a court of law.
When it comes to identifying a suspect in a criminal investigation, there are several factors that can be taken into consideration. These factors can include:
1. Eyewitness Accounts: Eyewitnesses who have observed the crime or have seen someone who fits the description of the suspect can provide valuable information.
2. Physical Evidence: Physical evidence, such as fingerprints, DNA, or other trace evidence, can help investigators identify a suspect. This evidence is often collected at the crime scene and analyzed in a forensic laboratory.
3. Surveillance Footage: In many cases, surveillance cameras or other forms of video footage can capture images of the suspect, which can assist in identification.
4. Modus Operandi: The modus operandi refers to the pattern or method of operation used by a suspect in committing the crime. Investigators may analyze the similarities between different crimes to identify a suspect.
5. Informants or Tips: Sometimes, informants or tips from the public can provide information about the identity of a suspect. This information is carefully evaluated and verified by investigators.
6. Alibis and Witness Statements: Investigators will also consider alibis provided by potential suspects and statements from witnesses who may have seen or interacted with the suspect around the time of the crime.
It’s important to note that identifying a suspect is a complex process that requires careful evaluation of all available evidence. Investigators must ensure that their findings are based on solid evidence and follow proper legal procedures to avoid wrongful accusations.
