*THE TYRANNY OF FALSE PROMISES* : _A RADICAL CRITIQUE OF APC LEADERSHIP ASPIRANTS_
*(UNDILUTED)*
Raymond Kamara
Omega National Front
22/03/2025
GRA – Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
[email protected]
*A Nation at the Crossroads*
Sierra Leone stands at a precarious juncture. While citizens languish under what many characterize as the oppressive governance of President Maada Bio’s Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) regime, the main opposition All People’s Congress (APC) confronts a leadership selection crisis that threatens to perpetuate rather than alleviate the suffering of ordinary Sierra Leoneans. This critical analysis examines the dire implications of choosing compromised leadership for the 2027/28 electoral contest.
*The Parade of Pretenders*
The current lineup of APC flagbearer aspirants represents what political scientist Robert Michels would identify as an “entrenchment of oligarchy” – individuals who have mastered the aesthetics of leadership without embodying its substance. Their carefully choreographed public personas constitute a masterclass in what sociologist Erving Goffman termed “impression management,” constructing facades that bear little resemblance to their authentic character and intentions.
These political chameleons deploy populist rhetoric while harboring profoundly elitist and self-serving agendas. Their performance of concern for citizens’ welfare masks what political theorist C. Wright Mills would recognize as the calculated preservation of power for a privileged few. The flagbearer selection process risks becoming a mere reallocation of extraction rights rather than a genuine opportunity for transformative leadership.
*The Shadow of Patronage Politics*
The looming influence of former President Ernest Koroma over the selection process exemplifies the persistence of neo-patrimonial politics in Sierra Leone. This system, which political scientist Patrick Chabal defines as the “personalization of power and the privatization of public resources,” threatens to subordinate meritocratic considerations to loyalty and factional interests.
The ongoing cultivation of tribal and regional identities as political currencies represents a cynical exploitation of Sierra Leone’s diversity. These manufactured divisions serve as smokescreens for what is, at its core, a competition for resource control among elites with remarkably similar extractive ambitions.
*The Economics of Leadership Failure*
Sierra Leone’s economic trajectory offers a stark illustration of leadership consequences. Despite abundant natural resources, the nation continues to occupy lower positions on human development indices. This paradox exemplifies what economist Joseph Stiglitz identifies as “governance capture” – where state institutions primarily serve elite interests rather than public welfare.
The aspirants’ economic platforms largely represent variations of what development economist William Easterly terms “planners” rather than “searchers” – top-down approaches disconnected from local realities and community needs. Their economic promises lack credible implementation mechanisms, suggesting continuity with rather than departure from the failed policies that have maintained Sierra Leone’s chronic underdevelopment.
*The Deception of Reform Rhetoric*
The reform credentials of many aspirants constitute what political philosopher Noam Chomsky might call “necessary illusions” – narratives designed to manufacture consent while preserving systemic dysfunction. Their critiques of the current regime’s human rights abuses and democratic backsliding, while valid, often lack self-reflection on their own governance records or concrete commitments to institutional safeguards.
This performative opposition exemplifies what philosopher Herbert Marcuse termed “repressive tolerance” – the incorporation of dissent in ways that ultimately neutralize its transformative potential. The aspirants’ reform proposals typically avoid structural changes that would threaten established power relations or resource distribution patterns.
*The Criminal Alienation Complex*
The networks surrounding many aspirants constitute what could be termed “extraction coalitions” – interconnected groups whose primary objective is capturing state resources for private accumulation. Their campaigns represent investments expected to yield significant returns through patronage appointments and policy favoritism.
This dynamic illustrates political scientist Daron Acemoglu’s concept of “extractive institutions” – frameworks designed to channel resources from the many to the few. The aspirants’ inner circles often comprise individuals with questionable ethical records but strong capabilities in mobilizing identity-based support and manipulating electoral processes.
*The High Stakes of Selection*
The consequences of an erroneous leadership selection extend far beyond electoral cycles:
1. *Persistent Economic Stagnation*:
Leadership focused on extraction rather than development will prolong Sierra Leone’s economic underperformance, wasting another critical decade of potential growth.
2. *Democratic Regression*:
Self-serving leadership will likely maintain the facade rather than the substance of democratic governance, prioritizing power consolidation over institutional strengthening.
3. *Social Fragmentation*:
Leaders who exploit identity divisions for political advantage risk intensifying societal polarization, potentially reigniting conflicts in a nation still healing from civil war.
4. *International Marginalization*:
Compromised leadership will diminish Sierra Leone’s standing in regional and global forums, reducing its ability to advocate effectively for national interests.
*Beyond Decorative Donkeys:* Identifying Authentic Leadership
The path forward requires distinguishing between what political theorist Antonio Gramsci would call “traditional” versus “organic” intellectuals within the political class. The former primarily rationalize existing power structures, while the latter articulate transformative visions connected to broader societal interests.
Authentic leadership candidates would demonstrate:
1. *Proven Integrity*:
Not merely the absence of corruption scandals, but active records of prioritizing public over personal interests when these conflict.
2. *Policy Substance*:
Detailed, feasible governance proposals rather than vague aspirational statements or simplistic critiques of opponents.
3. *Inclusive Politics*:
Demonstrated commitment to transcending rather than exploiting ethnic, regional, and factional divisions.
4. *Institutional Respect* :
Evidence of strengthening rather than undermining democratic institutions when previously in positions of influence.
*The Revolutionary Act of Responsible Selection*
The APC’s flagbearer selection represents more than a partisan decision—it constitutes a pivotal moment for Sierra Leone’s developmental trajectory. The party faces a stark choice between perpetuating governance patterns that have failed ordinary citizens or embracing leadership capable of catalyzing genuine transformation.
As political philosopher Hannah Arendt observed, the essence of politics lies not in domination but in the creation of new beginnings. Sierra Leone desperately needs leadership that views power not as a prize to be captured but as a responsibility to be exercised in service of collective advancement. The revolutionary act available to the APC is not rhetorical radicalism but the radical responsibility of selecting leadership based on demonstrated commitment to public welfare rather than private accumulation.
The party must resist the seduction of “decorated donkeys” – candidates with impressive external qualities but lacking the character and capacity for transformative leadership. Sierra Leone’s citizens, having endured cycles of disappointed expectations, deserve more than another rotation of extractive elites. They deserve leadershipj that transforms the promise of democracy into the reality of improved lives.
The question is not merely who will lead the APC, but whether the APC will lead Sierra Leone toward a fundamentally different relationship between governors and governed – one based on service rather than exploitation, accountability rather than impunity, and collective prosperity rather than elite enrichment.
*Comrades of our beloved APC, (hmmm) open you eyes and brain, don’t toy with your future.*
End.
Over and Out.
- ©️Omega Salone
*THE TEST OF TRUE LEADERSHIP* – *LIES AND DECEIT SHROUDED IDENTITY FOR APC FLAGBEARER.*
Raymond Kamara
Omega National Front
23/03/2025
In the shadow of Sierra Leone’s deepening economic crisis under the current administration, a troubling phenomenon is emerging within the opposition All People’s Congress (APC). As the nation’s citizens endure unprecedented hardship, former beneficiaries of past APC governance are suddenly reappearing, positioning themselves as presidential aspirants despite their conspicuous absence during the people’s darkest hours.
Where were these self-proclaimed saviours when ordinary Sierra Leoneans faced human rights abuses? When party members were detained, when communities suffered, and when the faithful few maintained the APC party offices as sanctuaries for the persecuted?
These opportunists—once ministers, CEOs and agency heads under Ernest Bai Koroma’s leadership—abandoned their political home when adversity struck. They watched from comfortable distance as grassroots members endured the brunt of political persecution. Now, sensing the possibility of APC’s return to power, they emerge with grand promises and calculated displays of loyalty. 😂
*True leadership reveals itself during crisis, not in its aftermath.* The grassroots membership must question: Who stood with them when standing required courage? Who spoke when silence promised personal safety? Who sacrificed when sacrifice meant risk?
The APC faces a defining moment. Will it reward fair-weather politicians whose commitment extends only as far as personal ambition? Or will it recognize the authentic voices who remained steadfast, defending democratic principles when doing so carried real consequences?
Sierra Leone deserves leaders whose commitment to public service transcends political expediency—leaders tested by adversity and proven faithful to the people’s cause. As the nation yearns for relief from economic hardship and political repression, it cannot afford leadership built on opportunism rather than genuine service.
The grassroots must now assert their voice: No more business as usual. The party’s future, and indeed the nation’s, depends on distinguishing between those who serve themselves and those who truly serve Sierra Leone.
End.
Over and Out.
©️Omega National Front
Leave a Reply